How newest Lamar Jackson deal compares to Jalen Hurts agreement


sports Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson. (Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports)

Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson. (Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports)

Now that Jalen Hurts has made money by the Eagles, does the agreement use the Ravens supposedly offered Lamar Jackson compare?

Jalen Hurts is now the greatest paid gamer in the NFL thanks to his brand-new five-year agreement extension worth $255 million.

The Eagles quarterback is coming off an exceptional efficiency in the Super Bowl, in spite of being on the losing side. Philadelphia aspired to get him secured ahead of his impending complimentary firm in 2024.

The Ravens weren’t able to get their star quarterback extended prior to the problem of complimentary company got here. Baltimore has actually been involved in an agreement conflict with Lamar Jackson, making him a limited complimentary representative.

What does Hurts’ offer imply for Jackson?

Comparing the Lamar Jackson deal to Jalen Hurts’ agreement

Comparing the #Ravens use to Lamar Jackson and Jalen Hurts’ brand-new agreement is made complex. Clearness:
Injures: $179.3 M ensured for injury.
Lamar: $175M ensured for injury.

$200M ends up being ensured for ability, injury, cap in March 2026. $175M ensured, ends up being $200M.

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) April 17, 2023

Jackson had actually apparently been looking for a fully-guaranteed agreement. The closest the Ravens had actually pertained to that was a deal of a five-year, $250 million handle assurances that might increase as high as $200 million. That offer apparently consisted of $133 million ensured at finalizing, an overall of $175 million ensured in case of injury with $25 million more ensured if Jackson stayed on the lineup in 2026.

Injures’ offer supposedly consists of $110 million ensured at signing with $179 million ensured for injury.

The deals aren’t awfully far off.

Still, it would appear the problem for Jackson and the Ravens might still be structural. Albert Breer of the MMQB had this to state: “The issue, I think, with that for Jackson was the non-guaranteed years on completion of the offer.”

Harms’ agreement might provide some market clearness to the settlements in between Jackson and Ravens, however the 2 sides plainly have more to overcome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *